Prescribing rules updated for medications

Unfortunately, once the drugs are licensed, the regulators take their foot off the gas. There are systems for doctors to report unexpected effects in the day-to-day use of all drugs and devices but few reports are filed. The reasons for this failure are complicated. At their heart, the influence of the manufacturers is clear. Profits would be at risk if there was a consistent stream of news showing any drug was unsafe. When millions of dollars have been invested in getting the drug to market, doctors must look the other way. This is encouraged by financial and other incentives. It's only when people die that there are statistics for the regulators to look at.

This would be wonderful except it depends on the autopsy system to accurately identify cause of death and then honestly report it. Too often, deaths are considered "routine" and little effort is made to find anything to disturb the calm. Indeed, in many cases, evidence of medical malpractice ends up six feet under. The medical profession looks after its own. The one area where coroners tend to be honest is in reporting deaths through prescription-drug overdoses. This is not seen as threatening the profits of the manufacturers or the professional standing of the doctors. Perhaps it's not surprising that, given our country takes more drugs per head of population than any other country, we also have a rising tide of deaths through overdoses.

Washington state decided to take action and has published some tough new rules due to come into force on January 1, 2012. This is a complete reversal of policy. Back in the 1980's, studies suggested our doctors were failing to offer effective support to those in pain. Doctors responded by prescribing painkillers in increasing numbers. Medical boards smiled reassuringly and said they would not penalize doctors who prescribed drugs to relieve pain. Sadly, as opiate drug use grew, so did the number of deaths. This liberal regime is going to end.

Doctors are now preparing for the new procedures. This requires a detailed consideration of every patient's records to decide whether continuing to prescribe opiates is justified. Interestingly, many patients are now being cut off from supplies. Desperate people in pain are now flooding into clinics and hospitals. This is not what was expected. Even more interesting is the refusal of the medical board to reconsider the regulations. They did what the politicians required. Now it's left to the politicians to deal with the fallout.

Problems with Tramadol prescriptions

There's already evidence that there's abuse of over-the-counter painkillers as people denied access to opiates try to find alternates. Inevitably, Tramadol has been caught up in the confusion. Hospitals and clinics are refusing to take on new patients for medium- to long-term pain management. This denies patients access to Tramadol even though it has an unblemished track record of safety. Hopefully, this situation will be resolved in Washington and will also serve as a warning of the chaos if prescribing rules are changed without thinking through the consequences.

Read More

Working in Government sector � Doing Government job

When someone works for the Government, feeling for working with prestigious organisations come naturally. It is one of the best jobs to get. While working In the privet organisations you can get the good pay and salary but you can only get the good satisfaction for you job doing Sarkari Naukri for Government organisations.

There are many jobs you can apply with government.  The list includes bank jobs, legal jobs, defence jobs, police jobs, hospital jobs, construction jobs and so on. It is completely an individuals choice to decide which sarkari naukri he wants to do and for which government jobs he should apply.

Applying for the Sarkari Naukri is quite easy as well. All you have to do is submit the application for government jobs and sent it off to the address provided in the application forms. You should wait for a week or so to hear back from the government about your application. And if you do not hear back from them in this time then you can believe that your application has not been successful for government jobs. However, if you are successful in the primary stage of the application then you will receive a letter from government regarding your Sarkari Naukri and you will have to attain a formal interview as a second step. In this interview they will ask you why you want to do Sarkari Naukri in this particular filed of government and similar questions about government jobs.

The next step would be the training for Sarkari Naukri if you are successful. The time frame of this training may vary for one government jobs to another and this training is paid. But in the general, this may take up to one year to complete this Sarkari Naukri training. And the last step would be to start your first government jobs with the Government of India.

Once you start your job, then it is governments responsibilities to look after you needs and they do this pretty well. Every government jobs offer some incomparable benefits which includes travel benefits, petrol benefits, and pretty much everything which you get from doing privet job.

So, at the end, one would say that o.k. now I know that government jobs are good but how to know when there is a vacancy in public sector. Government generally advertise all these Sarkari Naukri in the local newspapers and now they also advertise these government jobs in some popular free classifieds website as well, so it can reach more people.

I wish you all the best for your new career with Government.

Read More

The Slots Operators Are Threatening to Sue

Just as we all used to follow the form of horses - think the Great Depression and the success of Seabiscuit to see we all love a champion - the latest form book covers the race among US states to balance their budgets. Of course, everyone has been focussing on California with Arnold Schwarzenegger leading the charge to the winning post on getting the budget signed into law. He has enough strength for arm twisting and 'gator wrassling to bulldoze the bill through. But Pennsylvania is just as interesting with the Governor's office matching California's use of IOUs by refusing to pay funds to the four state universities. Probably someone somewhere is running a book on which US state will be the first to declare itself bankrupt. These would be the front runners among an alarming number of states lacking initial prudence and the political will to raise taxes, to cut spending, or both.

Anyway, the real point of interest in Pennsylvania is the growing threat of litigation from the group of license holders who run slot machines. When the licenses were first issued, the state sold maximum exclusivity for a high fee (that's $50 million a license). The enabling law is very clear. No other gambling outlet will be allowed to compete directly with the market for slot machines. At the time, this looked a good deal for both sides. Gambling was a popular activity and the state benefited from a generous input to its finances. Fast forward and the recession has forced people to cut back on their discretionary spending. This means less money to spend on trips to gamble. Ironically, the casino operators to benefit from this have been online. Had it not been for the changes in the law making it difficult to move money into and out of the online casino accounts, they would have cleaned up. So this leaves the current license holders under pressure with building work on some of the proposed casino and resort sites put on hold. While the government finds an expanding black hole eating up its cash reserves as tax revenue falls. The state's answer is proposals to increase the number of slot machines allowed in the existing resorts and to license new resorts. To the existing license holders, this looks like plans to allow direct competition from new operators. They are up in arms with their attorneys slavering on the end of a short leash, just waiting for the chance to sue.

There's no doubt slots still represents a pot of gold for both the license holders and the state. The machines are still a big draw even though the recession is biting hard. But this plan looks like an expansion too far. The average spend has dropped. If the state increases the number of machines, this will only spread the same amount of money around more machines. It's not going to increase the size of the spend. This leaves the state with a growing hole in its accounts and the existing license holders with a good case in contract and constitutional law. With the online casinos introducing new slots games every month and keeping up player interest, this is no time to be fighting over a reducing market in the real world.

Read More